Mrs. Salahi’s 2nd Grade Resources

Debbie Salahi is a STAR member of the Discovery Educator Network

Archive for March, 2009

Mar
22

Learning for Understanding

Posted by Debbie Salahi

State content standards dictate what students will learn. Constructivism is a theory about how people learn. In a constructivist classroom, the teacher asks questions and guides students toward possible solutions. The focus is on the student and their construction of knowledge. “Students must be permitted the freedom to think, to question, to reflect, and to interact with ideas, objects and others – in other words, to construct meaning,” according to Martin G. Brooks and Jacqueline Grennon Brooks. Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe state, “If we don’t give students sufficient ongoing opportunities to puzzle over genuine problems, make meaning of their learning, and apply content in various contexts, then long-term retention and effective performance are unlikely…” I also like their idea that, “The textbook should serve as a resource, but not as the syllabus.

 

I have heard repeatedly in my educational career that I have to get my students to be able to perform at higher levels on Bloom’s taxonomy. Bloom’s taxonomy was developed to describe intellectual behavior that is important in learning. There is a list on the Concept to Classroom website (a 2002 selection for the Eisenhower National Clearinghouse’s Digital Dozen, a list of exemplary Web sites for educators) that lists the benefits of the constructivism. In reviewing the benefits I noticed that many were the higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. The benefits included application (apply, demonstrate, illustrate, interpret, use), analysis (compare/contrast, question), and synthesis (drawing inferences). I am not sure if reflection is quite as high as evaluation but it is important in learning.  Research shows that students were more likely to transfer skills learned in PBL. Perhaps the reason is that they are operating at higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy.

 

Justifications for using Project-Based Learning:

 

Greater transfer of learning to new situations

Engaged learners – more time on task means more time devoted to learning

Decrease in absenteeism means more time devoted to learning 

Opportunity to work on higher order thinking skills—critical thinkers

Promotes intrinsic motivation to learn

Students learn collaboration skills – learn how to work together

Increase oral and written communication skills

Learning for understanding, which it true knowledge

Independent workers

Promotes lifelong learning

Research show that it also improves test scores

 

Related reading used in this blog:

Concept to Classroom

http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.html

PBL Research Summary:  Studies Validate Project-based Learning – Edutopia

http://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning-research 

Mar
17

Project Based Learning

Posted by Debbie Salahi

I recently read three inspiring articles (“More Fun Than a Barrel of … Worms?!”, “Geometry Students Angle into Architecture Through Project Learning” and “March of the Monarchs: Students Follow the Butterflies’ Migration”) from the Edutopia web site. Project-Based Learning (PBL) is an “in-depth investigation of a real-world topic worthy of children’s attention and effort.” This is an active hands-on approach. Perhaps the most important parts of the students’ learning are how to collaborate, problem-solve, and work with their peers. In their future careers these interpersonal skills will be essential.

All three projects had many things in common. It was the enthusiasm of the students that was the most exciting. The projects were designed to address content standards but to extend knowledge and apply that student learning. The first thing a teacher needs to do is change her mind set of the one dispenser of knowledge to learner that doesn’t know everything, but that’s okay we are all learning together. “Teachers must be willing to work harder to ensure that projects are meaningful learning experiences.” The PBL projects were more labor intensive on the part of the teacher. The teacher needed to do a lot of planning with the projects; incorporating as many state standards as she could, coming up with a guiding question, setting up field work (field trips and lab work), collaborating with others in the project, setting up experts, etc.

Two of the projects put students in the role of thinking and acting like a scientist. In the first grade classroom there was a sign about a first grade wormologist. In the third grade classroom students not only shared their observations with scientists through the Journey North database, they had access to working scientists “who take questions about the different migrations.”  The geometry students consulted with and were judged by professional architects. It was very evident that what students were doing had real world applications. Students are required to use their problem-solving and collaborative abilities to create a project that meets the requirements set by the teacher.

 

After the guiding question is decided, the role of the teacher is one of master planner, designer of the project requirements, event planner and facilitator. She is no longer the sole source of knowledge. In every case the students had contact with experts. The teacher sets up the experiences so that the students can do the hard work. The teacher asks probing questions, she offers suggestions and provides support, encouragement and feedback.

 

These learning experiences increase student engagement because of their real-life application. These hands-on experiences are more interesting and fun for students. The students may have had input into the choice of the project. They certainly have some choice built into their work.  Children are enthusiastic when they see that their efforts make a difference. Kids are excited to hear and talk with experts. They are excited about getting out of the classroom and the exploring that is a part of field trips. All these things increase student engagement.

 

Students work harder when they have an authentic audience (like writing a real letter) so this helps transfer the knowledge they have from language arts. They put more energy into projects they can share with family and friends. Because the students spend more time on task they learn more. Teachers find there is not as much re-teaching. Students use what they are learning in their projects. This helps them remember it. One third grader said, “If you find it yourself, it stays in your brain.” I think that is a great testament for real knowledge. 

Terms of Use
Copyright 2008 Discovery Education. All rights reserved
Discovery Education is a Division of Discovery Communications, LLC.

Bad Behavior has blocked 8 access attempts in the last 7 days.